These are more complex legal figure
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:30 am
Many people intend to call a company what it is not: an unstructured personal action; professionalism in the exercise of the company is confused with professionalism in the exercise of the business purpose, which is a monstrous mistake. It is one thing to be a good mechanic; it is another thing to run a mechanics company, whether as an entrepreneur or a business corporation . Professional, autonomous action does not make a company. It is much more than that. And this must be learned because many stumbles and even tragedies result from mistakes. Being a good cook, being a good kitchen professional, does not solve the business challenge . You have to be a good entrepreneur or corporate administrator. It's different.
It is torturous to walk on the obvious ground when, due bulk sms malaysia packages to a biased culture – the Brazilian market and its mercantile habits – people simply close their eyes to the obvious. The structuring of a company (including the legal structuring) presupposes a harmful issue that is economic. Since we write in a legal context, let's put it in legal terms: clients want to open a company.
Is it viable? Legal viability, first of all, which does not seem to be a big problem in the vast majority of cases. But there is this other, even more pressing issue: economic viability. So what? Will this business succeed? Is it possible for it to succeed? Or will it rise like a shooting star: streaking across the sky, burning itself out, destined for the ground? And, since we intend to be elementary in our analysis, we will work on a very simple company to demonstrate that, here too, as in the construction of a shack, science and technique are necessary to avoid collapses and landslides.
Here is a problem: what does this frightening number of companies that fail to survive more than three years after being created tell us? The most common answer does not seem true in itself: such business initiatives are victims of an unviable country, a perverse economy. Yes, there are economic and legal adversities.
It is torturous to walk on the obvious ground when, due bulk sms malaysia packages to a biased culture – the Brazilian market and its mercantile habits – people simply close their eyes to the obvious. The structuring of a company (including the legal structuring) presupposes a harmful issue that is economic. Since we write in a legal context, let's put it in legal terms: clients want to open a company.
Is it viable? Legal viability, first of all, which does not seem to be a big problem in the vast majority of cases. But there is this other, even more pressing issue: economic viability. So what? Will this business succeed? Is it possible for it to succeed? Or will it rise like a shooting star: streaking across the sky, burning itself out, destined for the ground? And, since we intend to be elementary in our analysis, we will work on a very simple company to demonstrate that, here too, as in the construction of a shack, science and technique are necessary to avoid collapses and landslides.
Here is a problem: what does this frightening number of companies that fail to survive more than three years after being created tell us? The most common answer does not seem true in itself: such business initiatives are victims of an unviable country, a perverse economy. Yes, there are economic and legal adversities.